Why People Need To Be Wary Of Products That Claim To Remove Fluoride From Water

By Quin McDarling


There are both advantages and disadvantages of removing certain chemicals from water; therefore, caution is required when using products that claim to remove fluoride from water. Fluoride is commonly found in water and can cause health problems when ingested, such as tooth decay. Experts believe that H2O fluoridation has several factors that lead to various health risks.

There are four ways of removing fluoride from water, and with this aluminium based treatment, about 90% of fluoride can be removed. But since this is a very slow process there can be serious health risks for consumers.

On the other hand, reverse osmosis can remove virtually all contaminants that can be found in H20 while distillation is also regarded as very effective since it can produce pure H20. However, the main problem often encountered is related to the slowness of the process since it takes longer and it can be difficult to be sustained for large quantities of H20 for domestic consumption. Whilst Granular Activated Carbon and KDF have proved to remove this chemical component, the main problem noted is of inconsistency in the results.

People need to be cautious of suppliers who provide products claiming to remove fluoride using only the carbon filter. The effectiveness of removal process is largely dependent on the period spent while in contact with the media. In case of high flow rates, nothing gets removed. Another consideration is regarding the nature of water itself. There is generally high PH concentration found in water coming from volcanic sources as compared to water from other natural sources.

There are many benefits and drawbacks of removing fluoride from water. Treating the water with aluminium media is a commonly used method, but is very slow and can be quite risky. On the other hand, reverse osmosis is also a very slow process but more effective.

Though effective, the distillation method is very expensive especially for smaller quantities of H20 for household needs. Granular Activated Carbon and KDF method cannot be trusted as a result of its inconsistency. The most trusted water filter kiwipure limited does not guarantee that it can remove fluoride from water hence people should be concerned about companies which claim to be capable of dealing with this challenge.

Water filter Wellington is one of the most effective methods of removing certain chemicals from water. However, it is also known to have its side effects on human health. There has not been any perfectly reliable method discovered for removing these chemical components, however, some are more effective than others.

One way of fluoridation is by adding certain chemical compounds to H2O. Sodium fluoride, for example, is an easy to handle chemical, but it is quite expensive for domestic use. Fluorosilicate acid, even though not very expensive, but has huge shipment costs as it comes in liquid form. Sodium fluorosilicate has low shipment costs as compared to others. As it is not easy to determine the effectiveness of fluoridation methods, they cannot be completely relied upon and have their own benefits and drawbacks.

There are different methods which can be implemented in the fluoridation process of H20 but the main problem encountered is related to risks associated with health care for people. As a result of many disadvantages of fluoridation, people should be weary of products that claim to remove fluoride from the water.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment